@semibogan true but GCHQ cracked it after the Swedes had already WTFPWNd them!
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@semibogan until they started using radio-teletype, wiretap was required, so Swedes got first look.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @n1vux
@n1vux@semibogan yep, physical line through Sweden, they got first dibs. even long term, over radio was rare regardless of geography2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Enigma and T52 were oh so subtly flawed, but good attempts for the day - adequate for effort expected. :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg all historical crypto is vulnerable. VENONA showed even OTP vulnerable to bad implementation ! what's the criteria?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg correction: Naval JN -25 is book, true; Diplomatic Red+Purple were machines between Lorenz / Enigma in complexity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg nope. Totally separate networks, totally separate technology. Colored codebooks was a third thing entirely.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@n1vux damn you, will have to re-read it. http://bit.ly/19L6J3T <- which of those were cipher machine-based, not codebooks?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.