@mruef *exactly* the point. methodology is bullshit. leads to bullshit results (stats) that are not questioned.
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Agreed. But the missing questioning is the flaw of the reader, not the stats. Most ppl can't read nor question stats.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Feel free. Screenshots don't prove me wrong. Arguments do.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Which one? Your opinion of me seems to be too high :P I still agree with you. Basically and partially. Isn't this enough? ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg They should do it anyway. Even if the source appears to be trustworthy. Same for stats: Always question and verify yourself.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I know that it doesn't work. But my desire isn't wrong because of that. Just hate every stat because ppl don't understand?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.