You keep using the term "WAF". I do not think it means what you think @CloudFlare. http://bit.ly/1c4MJft
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@CloudFlare blocking "Rolex". Win!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WeldPond
@WeldPond@CloudFlare I think they have a WACBS, not a WAF. (web application content blocking system)#notthesame1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare email me (matthew at cloudflare) and we'll set you up on our traditional rules-based WAF.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eastdakota
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare wait, you have to opt-in to an actual WAF? the default is content blocking only?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare no, we have a heuristic-based WAF. Added a more traditional rules-based WAF. Right now it's invite only.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @eastdakota
@eastdakota@attritionorg@WeldPond website says "CloudFlare protects against a range of threats: cross site scripting, SQL injection.."3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jkouns
@jkouns@attritionorg@WeldPond we still believe it's the future, but have realized some people want rules-based. So now we have that too.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@eastdakota @jkouns @WeldPond You guys haven't fixed any of it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.