You keep using the term "WAF". I do not think it means what you think @CloudFlare. http://bit.ly/1c4MJft
@eastdakota @WeldPond @CloudFlare wait, you have to opt-in to an actual WAF? the default is content blocking only?
-
-
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare but the rules-based WAF is pretty sweet. <500µ to do full OWASP ruleset. Fully customizable.#staytuned -
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare yeah, that is great. EXCEPT, it is opt-in, private, not for plebeian users. NOT A WAF -
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare it's in beta. It'll get released widely as soon as testing is done. Which will be soon. -
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare uh, "beta"? Then remove the term "WAF" from the page. It isn't one, at all.#falseadvertising
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare no, we have a heuristic-based WAF. Added a more traditional rules-based WAF. Right now it's invite only. -
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare wait.. web page is content related. no "heuristic-based" at all. invite only for a real WAF?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.