@attritionorg @CloudFlare blocking "Rolex". Win!
-
-
-
@WeldPond@CloudFlare I think they have a WACBS, not a WAF. (web application content blocking system)#notthesame -
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare email me (matthew at cloudflare) and we'll set you up on our traditional rules-based WAF. -
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare wait, you have to opt-in to an actual WAF? the default is content blocking only? -
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare but the rules-based WAF is pretty sweet. <500µ to do full OWASP ruleset. Fully customizable.#staytuned -
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare yeah, that is great. EXCEPT, it is opt-in, private, not for plebeian users. NOT A WAF -
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CloudFlare it's in beta. It'll get released widely as soon as testing is done. Which will be soon. -
@eastdakota@WeldPond@CloudFlare uh, "beta"? Then remove the term "WAF" from the page. It isn't one, at all.#falseadvertising
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg@CloudFlare forget it, they don't do WAF, never did.@Incapsula_com does a decent job, though.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@attritionorg@CloudFlare Inconceivable! -
@JPettorino You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.