@attritionorg A new nominee for the charlatan file (story all made up, receipt from a test I performed in 2008): http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/15/technology/security/bank-heist/index.html …
-
-
Replying to @oliverlavery
@oliverlavery interesting, but definitely need more details / evidence1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg still have the deposit slip from the test printer (Walked up the street to get evidence at an ATM? What utter BS)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oliverlavery
@oliverlavery Right, easy to pick out the likely BS. But its he-said charlatan-said. That is not evidence unfortunately.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I can poke holes in two claims immediately. The deposit slip has my name on it, and is dated 2008. Client would corroborate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oliverlavery
@oliverlavery an official corroboration from the client that can be published = evidence1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg client out of business in 2008. CPOC would corroborate. Meantime trying to get Nish to recant.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oliverlavery
@oliverlavery confront him, get him to publicly recant = evidence1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Sad times when no evidence is required to make outrageous claims, but disproving them is a battle. What an industry…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@oliverlavery Welcome to 13 years of my frustration.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.