@attritionorg Emailed follow up with references. Would be good to include @ErrataRob blog as well. I suggest a panel for further discussion
@ErrataRob While you did not say it, your rebuttal is heavily based on China while ignoring the other 9823 players.
-
-
@attritionorg but, if you stopped the "cyber", the espionage would continue unabated -
@ErrataRob agreed. but.. want to hazard a guess on the % of espionage that would happen real world vs cyber? -
@attritionorg Maybe some of the lesser value targets become not worth the effort. -
@ErrataRob How do you identify the 'lesser value targets' so easily these days? Not like the 60/70's.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg My point was that China has a police similar to what Russia had during the cold war of getting as much secrets as possible -
@ErrataRob@attritionorg The difference in national view of espionage is one of my favorite topics. They are not all the same IMHO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg in basic hacks like phishing and SQLi, all the world's a player -
@ErrataRob and we've established those are "cyberwar" when they work.#lcd
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg Actually, my bias is "if you click on it, why the fuck worry about who sent it" -
@ErrataRob TRUTH BROTHER. and that is a point desperately missing from most arguments. -
@attritionorg@ErrataRob Because reasons! (Including: story deadline; falling paper circulation; PR stunts; sales!; cyberwar!)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg it's nothing really new, and frankly Russia still has that police, so does France, Japan, Iran, and really, EVERY?ONEThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.