Defining the qualities of cyber warfare - SC Magazine http://j.mp/10wKMS7 < cc:@attritionorg and @joshcorman Some good info here for you
@jeffreycarr @joshcorman Several things in the article we already outline/argue. He disagrees a bit in one area, but semantics really.
-
-
@attritionorg@joshcorman For example, current military use of cyber in Iraq/Afghanistan should be defined separately. -
@jeffreycarr@joshcorman We largely argue that while it may be a 5th domain, it augments the others as much as anything. -
@attritionorg@joshcorman And acts of cyber espionage aren't examples of warfare at all. -
@jeffreycarr@joshcorman We argue it may be a prelude to war. Depending on definition, cyberwar is always happening potentially -
@attritionorg@joshcorman Yes, I agree. It is certainly a prelude to war (preparation of the battlespace, etc.) but it's not cyberwar. -
@jeffreycarr@joshcorman again, goes back to who's definition you use. our point is elements of CW are already happening regardless -
@attritionorg@joshcorman The LOAC specifically rules out espionage as warfare so I'm not sure what you're referring to. -
@jeffreycarr@joshcorman Common definitions of cyberwar. Elements of them, are/have been happening for ages (on and offline) - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg@joshcorman Hacking activities done in parallel with kinetic warfare (RU-GE; ISRAEL-HAMMAS) should be defined separately. -
@jeffreycarr@joshcorman Why? War is war. In this case, they mix domains to achieve the desired result, just as it has been for ages. -
@attritionorg@joshcorman Yes, but I think that breaking it out into sub-categories helps make the examples cleaner so that
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.