Hope @CloudFlare can make a statement about this: http://zeroscience.mk/files/wafreport2013.pdf … (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5306519 ) - I'm pretty annoyed as a paying customer.
-
-
Replying to @bluetidepro
@bluetidepro@CloudFlare flawed testing strategy that assumes a last-generation, rules-based WAF. We've always worked differently.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eastdakota
@eastdakota@bluetidepro@CloudFlare@mikedamm Serious gaps in your WAF were reported over a year ago. None fixed. Now this...7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@bluetidepro@CloudFlare@mikedamm best analogy is spam filters. In 1998, everyone used rules-based SpamAssassin.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @eastdakota
@eastdakota @bluetidepro @mikedamm With that analogy, a @CloudFlare spam filter "works" by allowing all spam through. #derp
3:02 PM - 1 Mar 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.