@attritionorg I entered "web security" in 2000, so can't speak much about 1999, but even then, SQLi vulns were very rare to hear about.
-
-
Replying to @jeremiahg
@jeremiahg@stevewerby thinking about writing more on the history of vulns (the diff classes), as well as a preso on it w/ a diff slant.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@jeremiahg be surprised how long some vuln classes have been around and how much more quickly they're widely exploited.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stevewerby
@stevewerby@jeremiahg That is kind of the idea behind the preso I have in mind, along with many other points people seem to miss.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@stevewerby@jeremiahg I'd be curious as to vuln[0] for various weaknesses. First discussion of BO that I know of is 1972...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gdead
@gdead@attritionorg@stevewerby@jeremiahg 1972? First one I ever saw was the USAF's 1974 multics security paper http://seclab.cs.ucdavis.edu/projects/history/papers/karg74.pdf …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@youbetyourballs @gdead We have a lot of historic MULTICS vulns from 74 - 79, no "overflow" though. http://bit.ly/12TWvws
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.