@kylemaxwell Trust me, I want to be open. May involve publishing information re: her that would be covered by expectation of privacy.
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@kylemaxwell seems acceptable to find out what you are dealing with before responding.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @loon
@loon@kylemaxwell With her publishing that, I think it is 'over', we know what we're dealing with. Just other factors to consider.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@loon how was it not over when you said "don't publish, that will compete with our plans"?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kylemaxwell
@kylemaxwell@loon This was not just about the report. That was one facet of her usage of the data. She forgot to mention on her blog.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@kylemaxwell@loon We disagree on the term commercial. The research is free, the preso was free. DFA has no sponsors.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SuzanneWidup
@SuzanneWidup@kylemaxwell@loon You over-simplify it. DFA has commercial income. "The research is free" is the #1 excuse we hear.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@kylemaxwell@loon DFA's slight income is from membership. Our orgs were founded for similar reasons--to foster research.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SuzanneWidup
@SuzanneWidup@kylemaxwell@loon Income is income. Using "free" research (based on our laborious work) to gain members/income is commercial.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@SuzanneWidup@kylemaxwell@loon Sounds like what you are doing. Most of your data is public. This argument is a falsehood.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@lpingree @SuzanneWidup @kylemaxwell @loon It is, so you and others can go compile your own database, problem solved!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.