RT @wimremes: hmm … how isn't it clear that O in OSF doesn't stand for FREE? <-- and it actually was free for YEARS. we just got abused.
-
-
-
Replying to @drbearsec
@drbearsec@wimremes Companies using our data for high-dollar commercial gain, without any contribution to the project (data, money, etc).4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@wimremes Fair enough. Does your licensing differentiate between commercial and non-profit use? Academic fair-use?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drbearsec
@drbearsec@wimremes It does, but NFP use is being heavily blurred by many orgs these days. Definitely not a clear line any more.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@wimremes is not the case. NFP earns income but the profit is put back into the organization vs commercial ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drbearsec
@drbearsec If they are using *our* data, shouldn't something be put back into *our* NFP org? Other than $20 I mean.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Possibly. Depends on the context of use. Obviously a complete publishing of your data goes beyond fair use2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drbearsec
@drbearsec Even after that, it gets really complicated. A "free" report that leads to commercial opportunity = blurry line as an example1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Fair enough, as I said wanted to understand the situation. Thanks for the engaging conversation!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@drbearsec Absolutely. I hope to find time to write up a lot more going forward. So many things on the todo list.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.