Would you rather have 10 0-day, or 10,000 vulns that were technically public, but no VDB or vuln scanner knew about? Justify your answer.
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg As an outlier, I think the 0days would be preferable if in hard to update systems (e.g. Mainframe, firmware, protocols)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChrisJohnRiley
@ChrisJohnRiley Disagree. Hard to update = the known issues hard to update (aka the 'forever day' bugs). 0day doesn't matter to those.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg That's a conversation to have over alcohol I think… 140 chars just aren't enough (as usual)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ChrisJohnRiley
@ChrisJohnRiley agree, pencil me in!
12:33 AM - 16 Dec 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.