Curious how many proposals #shmoocon received for talks, vs how many speaking slots they have. Anyone? (cc @myrcurial)
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg curious as to how many repeat speakers ie friends and family got accepted#shmoocon6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jadedsecurity
@jadedsecurity@attritionorg Calling repeats “Friends and Family” does their reviewers a disservice. I trust their fairness implicitly.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarthNull
@DarthNull@attritionorg something must be said about the review process. Every single lightening talk last year should of been in2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jadedsecurity
@jadedsecurity@darthnull@attritionorg Well it goes back to the question... Would blind selection produce better talk selections?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drbearsec
@drbearsec@jadedsecurity@darthnull The CFP team seeing abstracts without names I think would be the best way to do it for any con.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Doing blind reviews is hard if part of your mission is to get new ppl the chance to present.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.