@attritionorg @drbearsec @darthnull yeah. Or even put up for a community vote. #ideal
-
-
Replying to @jadedsecurity
@jadedsecurity@attritionorg@drbearsec@DarthNull WOAH, Community Vote? What do you think this is#BSidesPGH?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @integgroll
.
@integgroll That's cool#BSidesPGH does community, another BSides does blind review.#fan1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I know it will just make me seem a sore loser, but I thought it was blind going in, and really don't see a better way.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @integgroll
@integgroll Blind or community, I would guess are largely more fair to submitters. Hard to prove that either way though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I really think community with or without names can cause the conference to drift from what the organizers want talk wise.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @integgroll
@integgroll Yes, that would be a problem with community, IF the con has a specific theme that year.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Agreed, which it seems that the con in question this year did. But if I submit to a con, I am already going either way.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @integgroll
@integgroll Based on tweets, more and more are submitting talks, and if accepted, actually writing the talk and attending.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I won't lie, when I submitted I was not completely done, and I still probably am not. I could work on this forever really.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@integgroll Difference between "not done" (meaning you started), and writing an abstract w/ nothing else ready.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.