RT @stylewar: @attritionorg No one CARES about the technicalities of your actions. <-- because they simply don't understand, or they might
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg so... 'researchers' on effects of disease and torture on Jews should only be convicted by 'peers' eh? Nice argument....2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I don't think you're crazy! I find it odd who you're choosing for a mascot tho. lol2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg till then, (for me) I argue against anyone hitching their argument wagon to him. future args will come. Must be well met.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg its interesting to hear you argue *against* disclosure ... Does that only apply to code? Why not to errata?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg meaning: if research is inaccurate/false, your past args tend to indicate you AGREE with pointing them out.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.