@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech There'd need to be immediately exigent circumstances or immunity on the table to mitigate that, as it stands.
@stylewar "case is about motivation, action & outcome" and "they don't need to understand all to come to reasonable conclsn". Contradiction?
-
-
@attritionorg you deleted the word "perfectly"... No contradiction. -
@stylewar so "partially" understand and come to a reasonable outcome? I don't think that is fair to any accused. -
@attritionorg neither is it fair to expect experts to only be convicted by experts. That's a nonsensical and unachievable notion bro. -
@stylewar right, don't expect jury of experts. but do want a jury of reasonably educated on a given subject matter. has to be middle ground -
@attritionorg that's fair. I agree... Would be interesting to hear what the jury thought. Why they decided. I just don't assume they failed. -
@stylewar i don't know if they failed or not. would have to read entire case transcript to see arguments and presentation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg and outcome is negative... No one CARES about the technicalities of your actions.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@attritionorg jurors don't know science...But understand motivations. Outcomes. "repainted" action is sad, but ... When motivation is sour..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.