@rabite @attritionorg Maybe I'm missing a key point.
-
-
Replying to @Ange1oC
@SecAndSecTech I think you are missing that some disclosures, even well intentioned, go horribly wrong. Why disclose at risk of jail?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech There'd need to be immediately exigent circumstances or immunity on the table to mitigate that, as it stands.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @6
@6@attritionorg Let's be honest Logs show what@rabite was doing could hardly qualify as research. 12 people agree Good luck on your appeal2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech@rabite you don't have to be technical to understand perpetrator motivation, basic actions, or outcome.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg already been on a jury. Subject was released on a technicality...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg really??? You believe that he was purely motivated, free from wrong, and justified in action? That he was PURELY a researcher?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.