Weev's article for @wired. I lost, what little respect I had left, for Wired magazine. http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/hacking-choice-and-disclosure/ … @rabite
@SecAndSecTech "12 people agree". Are you really suggesting @rabite was found guilty by a jury of his peers, that understand tech issues?
-
-
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech@rabite you don't have to be technical to understand perpetrator motivation, basic actions, or outcome. -
@stylewar Sweet Jesus, I hope you are never on a jury. -
@attritionorg already been on a jury. Subject was released on a technicality... -
@stylewar You seem to have a very black & white view on things that are absolutely not so. -
@attritionorg really??? You believe that he was purely motivated, free from wrong, and justified in action? That he was PURELY a researcher? -
@stylewar You said jury doesn't need to be technical to understand "basic actions" for starters. In compsec cases, they really do. -
@attritionorg point is that they don't need to understand all perfectly in order to come to a reasonable conclusion. -
@stylewar "case is about motivation, action & outcome" and "they don't need to understand all to come to reasonable conclsn". Contradiction? - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech@rabite The real world has edges. intellectual hemophiliacs and social retards need not apply.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.