Weev's article for @wired. I lost, what little respect I had left, for Wired magazine. http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/hacking-choice-and-disclosure/ … @rabite
@SecAndSecTech I think you are missing that some disclosures, even well intentioned, go horribly wrong. Why disclose at risk of jail?
-
-
@attritionorg@rabite No right or wrong answer. History is full of people who risked being jailed for research. Sharing makes it worth it. -
@SecAndSecTech Says the person not risking 10 years in jail. (cc
@rabite)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech There'd need to be immediately exigent circumstances or immunity on the table to mitigate that, as it stands. -
@6@attritionorg Let's be honest Logs show what@rabite was doing could hardly qualify as research. 12 people agree Good luck on your appeal -
@SecAndSecTech "12 people agree". Are you really suggesting
@rabite was found guilty by a jury of his peers, that understand tech issues? -
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech@rabite you don't have to be technical to understand perpetrator motivation, basic actions, or outcome. -
@stylewar Sweet Jesus, I hope you are never on a jury. -
@attritionorg already been on a jury. Subject was released on a technicality... -
@stylewar You seem to have a very black & white view on things that are absolutely not so. -
@attritionorg really??? You believe that he was purely motivated, free from wrong, and justified in action? That he was PURELY a researcher? - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg @SecAndSecTech The balance of risk on network-specific disclosure is what's problematic in that area.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.