"No known exploits in the wild" - wait ... is that a good thing, or a bad thing? > http://ow.ly/e7E6X
-
-
@attritionorg That's one of the better replies I've gotten... -
@Wh1t3Rabbit bonus, it is entirely accurate in that debate! -
@attritionorg sadly some would equate "not being exploited" with "there is no exploit" or "no one is exploiting"... neither are logical -
@Wh1t3Rabbit also important.. vendor didn't know about the vuln in the first place. why do they think they will know of EiTW? -
@attritionorg@Wh1t3Rabbit Most methods increase risk level if exploit is "known". I'd say risk level is higher when existence is NOT known.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.