@Wh1t3Rabbit @ErrataRob welcome to the age old "attribution" debate.
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@erratarob Seems to always come down to pin the "bad" on the right person, or nation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Wh1t3Rabbit
@Wh1t3Rabbit@ErrataRob Sure, but difference between doing it in media and rhetoric, and as justification for kinetic response.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@ErrataRob In all seriousness, what evidence would be needed to be 'sure'... where's the "smoking gun"? What is enough?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Wh1t3Rabbit
@Wh1t3Rabbit@ErrataRob Some argue, quite convincingly, that 100% air tight attribution is simply impossible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@ErrataRob I would probably be in that camp...you just don't know. Once you lose physical evidence capability, it's best-guess1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Wh1t3Rabbit
@Wh1t3Rabbit@ErrataRob Goes much further and more interesting for debate. Stuxnet, who was involved? Are you sure? Why?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@ErrataRob ...the lines of allegiance just aren't there anymore, I don't believe... but I'm way out on a limb here...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Wh1t3Rabbit
@Wh1t3Rabbit@attritionorg Meh. Attribution is easy. Look how easy it was to attribute 9/11 to Iraq.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@erratarob@attritionorg Err, I'm going to assume that 9/11 comment was snarky otherwise...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Wh1t3Rabbit I bet @ErrataRob was totally serious, and he is a big jerk.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.