@Wh1t3Rabbit Per Tallinn, the "cyber attack" definition includes "damage or destruction to objects". Stuxnet would then qualify.
@Wh1t3Rabbit @ErrataRob Goes much further and more interesting for debate. Stuxnet, who was involved? Are you sure? Why?
-
-
@attritionorg@ErrataRob I can't say too many of us, even if we have evidence pointing to a specific machine, can tie a person > state now -
@Wh1t3Rabbit@attritionorg@ErrataRob Your conversation reminds me of Hansel & Gretel & the disappearing bread crumbs http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1428538/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg@ErrataRob ...the lines of allegiance just aren't there anymore, I don't believe... but I'm way out on a limb here... -
@Wh1t3Rabbit@attritionorg Meh. Attribution is easy. Look how easy it was to attribute 9/11 to Iraq. -
@erratarob@attritionorg Err, I'm going to assume that 9/11 comment was snarky otherwise... -
@Wh1t3Rabbit I bet@ErrataRob was totally serious, and he is a big jerk.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg@Wh1t3Rabbit The way to attribute is through convincing leaks. I'm astonished the identities haven't leaked out more.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.