Opens profile photo
Follow
Alex Trembath
@atrembath
Deputy Director . Ecomodernist. Promethean Hamiltonian Schumpeterian meliorist.
Non-Governmental & Nonprofit Organization Oakland, CAthebreakthrough.org/people/alex-tr…Joined April 2009

Alex Trembath’s Tweets

Long article expresses frustration with a nuclear regulatory institution that is slow to change. I've often thought that changes of public opinion on nuclear could be generational. Well it seems like changing the regulatory mindset could take longer still.
Quote Tweet
Will Washington Halt the Global Renaissance of Nuclear Power? - Hopes to slash emissions using nuclear energy are being dashed by U.S. regulators. foreignpolicy.com/2023/04/08/nuc
4
28
Show this thread
Please, please take the time to click on the link to the Foreign Policy article found in @atrembaths's tweet. and have clearly explained the crying need to change the way the approaches its regulatory mandate.
Quote Tweet
“Absent substantial regulatory reform, the future of nuclear energy in the United States will look very much like the past.” Important deep dive into Oklo’s struggles and NRC’s unacceptable proposed framework by ⁦@TedNordhaus⁩ ⁦@Dr_A_Stein⁩: foreignpolicy.com/2023/04/08/nuc
1
18
Wherever one stands on the issues, infrastructure permitting and construction will need to be addressed in a post-IRA world, yet I get the distinct sense that some corners of the climate advocacy community would rather just not talk about it.
2
24
Show this thread
Very interesting thread. Some thoughts here, we can put 300GW of #solar cost effectively on rooftops so let’s make sure we don’t forget that. Next, while the hype around 100% renewables is real it is not now nor has it ever been realistic.
Quote Tweet
I’m not now, nor have I ever been, an ecomodernist. But I strongly disagree with the argument being made here. The idea that renewables are worth their trade-offs & land-use impacts is a long-standing claim *not* of ecomodernists or climate liberals, but of the climate left. twitter.com/KetanJ0/status…
Show this thread
25
109
Show this thread
To have any sort of energy transition, whatever your preference, we need permitting reform Opposing permitting reforms is pushing to entrench the status quo and reduce competition Tax money is subsidizing new technologies and the money is spent on lawyers to fight the gov't...
Quote Tweet
This branch of eco modernist, pro-tech advocacy is becoming increasingly more explicit in being anti environmentalist. Their agenda:Wind, solar and transmission *should* be allowed to destroy biodiversity, and enviro regs need "permitting reform"to allow that...
Show this thread
Image
12
Begging people to be more consequentialist in their environmentalism, refusing to build renewable infrastructure to protect local environments will end up being much, much worse for the global environment Solving climate change requires building more low-carbon energy
Quote Tweet
This branch of eco modernist, pro-tech advocacy is becoming increasingly more explicit in being anti environmentalist. Their agenda:Wind, solar and transmission *should* be allowed to destroy biodiversity, and enviro regs need "permitting reform"to allow that...
Show this thread
Image
36
1,255
Show this thread
on the other hand, this kind of process-obsessed, status-quo preserving ""environmentalism"" is becoming increasingly explicit in its commitment to global warming and climate arson
Quote Tweet
This branch of eco modernist, pro-tech advocacy is becoming increasingly more explicit in being anti environmentalist. Their agenda:Wind, solar and transmission *should* be allowed to destroy biodiversity, and enviro regs need "permitting reform"to allow that...
Show this thread
Image
1
44
Show this thread
When wind and solar were niche markets, the "100% renewable" slogan was able to paper over fundamental differences between anti-growth and green growth environmentalism. That is no longer the case, and the coalition is falling apart, as documented here.
Quote Tweet
I’m not now, nor have I ever been, an ecomodernist. But I strongly disagree with the argument being made here. The idea that renewables are worth their trade-offs & land-use impacts is a long-standing claim *not* of ecomodernists or climate liberals, but of the climate left. twitter.com/KetanJ0/status…
Show this thread
3
Don't say I didn't warn you.
Quote Tweet
It seems inevitable that the marriage of convenience b/w clean energy lobbies and environmentalist groups will be tested once the former have secured 10 years of subsidies and the latter support regulatory barriers to actually using those subsidies. twitter.com/JStein_WaPo/st
Show this thread
1
9
When you say you care about climate change but are opposed to making it easier to build solar + wind + transmission... 🤔 (obviously the stuff about destroying biodiversity is a straw man)
Quote Tweet
This branch of eco modernist, pro-tech advocacy is becoming increasingly more explicit in being anti environmentalist. Their agenda:Wind, solar and transmission *should* be allowed to destroy biodiversity, and enviro regs need "permitting reform"to allow that...
Show this thread
Image
7
220
Show this thread
Stewart Brand’s writing put me on my current career path in clean energy, so unlike Rob I am/have been an ecomodernist (or at least a fellow traveler). Would co-sign on his whole thread here:
Quote Tweet
I’m not now, nor have I ever been, an ecomodernist. But I strongly disagree with the argument being made here. The idea that renewables are worth their trade-offs & land-use impacts is a long-standing claim *not* of ecomodernists or climate liberals, but of the climate left. twitter.com/KetanJ0/status…
Show this thread
12
Not only was it the mainstream environmental movement that embraced the “100% renewable energy” slogan as a core policy, but it’s been so dominant, for so long, that the funding community has been focused on HVDC transmission for over a decade to deal with this specific problem.
Quote Tweet
I’m not now, nor have I ever been, an ecomodernist. But I strongly disagree with the argument being made here. The idea that renewables are worth their trade-offs & land-use impacts is a long-standing claim *not* of ecomodernists or climate liberals, but of the climate left. twitter.com/KetanJ0/status…
Show this thread
1
47
Show this thread
Good thread pushing back against climate left's "100% renewables" demand:
Quote Tweet
I’m not now, nor have I ever been, an ecomodernist. But I strongly disagree with the argument being made here. The idea that renewables are worth their trade-offs & land-use impacts is a long-standing claim *not* of ecomodernists or climate liberals, but of the climate left. twitter.com/KetanJ0/status…
Show this thread
6
"Regulations" are nothing most people want to have anything to do with. puts in the work and produced some great additional ideas to the "ADANCE" act; yet another bipartisan attempt at getting the NRC to do its job...
1
I’m not now, nor have I ever been, an ecomodernist. But I strongly disagree with the argument being made here. The idea that renewables are worth their trade-offs & land-use impacts is a long-standing claim *not* of ecomodernists or climate liberals, but of the climate left.
Quote Tweet
This branch of eco modernist, pro-tech advocacy is becoming increasingly more explicit in being anti environmentalist. Their agenda:Wind, solar and transmission *should* be allowed to destroy biodiversity, and enviro regs need "permitting reform"to allow that...
Show this thread
Image
40
530
Show this thread
Clearly-argued thread reiterating the ecomodernist approach to really building energy stuff by .
Quote Tweet
I think the anti-ecomodernists need to get their stories straight. Are the ecological impacts of solar/wind exaggerated and permitting reform just a Trojan horse for fossil fuel interests? Or is permitting reform a free pass for solar and wind to "destroy biodiversity"? twitter.com/KetanJ0/status…
Show this thread
10
-Ecomodernism seeks to reform traditional environmentalism. That's not antienviro! -Ecomodernists support land-efficient nuclear/geothermal to reduce wind/solar overbuild -An ecomodern low-carbon world would have more trees than a traditional enviro vision *AND* more transmission
Quote Tweet
This branch of eco modernist, pro-tech advocacy is becoming increasingly more explicit in being anti environmentalist. Their agenda:Wind, solar and transmission *should* be allowed to destroy biodiversity, and enviro regs need "permitting reform"to allow that...
Show this thread
Image
8
123
Show this thread
This is complete bullshit. We've supported wind and solar - including subsidies and clean energy standards for almost 20 years. We also don't lie and obfuscate about the tradeoffs in terms of land use, mineral intensity, or preposterous 100% RE fantasy like Ketan.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @atrembath and @TheBTI
You're pro renewables to the extent that they anger, alienate and enrage environmentalists. If they're built in a sensitive and environmentally friendly way, that's not really fulfilling your mandate.
3
62
That the attacks on ecomodernists have become so varied — they're anti-renewables! no wait they're so PRO renewables they want to destroy biodiversity! no wait it's all fossil industry talking points! — is a sign, IMO, of needed introspection among institutional environmentalism.
1
25
Show this thread