Before YT drastically changed so much it was about views but now if you make content that is remotely close to being aggressive or otherwise what they deem unworthy of ad revenue then they won’t put up ads for that video and that is a major upset for creators that care about 
-
-
Replying to @jordanreapers @atradaitoshi and
I and many other creators don’t really care for making money on YT - yes it helps with bills an what not most definitely but a lot of creators enjoy making videos but if YouTube can’t provide a better reason why a video got struck or w.e then the platform will die out eventually
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jordanreapers @Monkey_MarkP and
You may not care about making money on YouTube but they do, and it's all they care about. Anything they can't explicitly profit off of will eventually just be purged from the platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @jordanreapers and
The LGBT population is 5% companies constantly make advertisements geared toward them. Do you think it's profitable to make ads for 5% of the population?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Monkey_MarkP @jordanreapers and
Those ads can appeal to LGBT sympathizers ("woke people") as well. Of whom you can't exactly measure the size of. If it weren't making money, they wouldn't be doing it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @jordanreapers and
Tell that to Gillette. It's about keeping a narrative. Once a company has enough money - they no longer need to make more, and now the narrative is what matters. Once Youtube had a monopoly on all user/online videos THEN the new rules started to come.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Monkey_MarkP @jordanreapers and
No - There is never "enough" money. That is not how business works. As
@Bill_Bickers was saying, ad blockers are rampant. And so Gillette went the route of advertising through word of mouth. Controversy gets people talking. You're talking about them right now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @Monkey_MarkP and
And they took a huge hit for their woke troubles. Again, You keep thinking with a focus on the advertisement dollars. I'm looking toward the future knowing the ad driven internet is dying off. People are kicking money directly to creators. YT should want to act as a middleman.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Bill_Bickers @Monkey_MarkP and
The owner's of Gillette are thriving right now. I agree though, YouTube should be doing that. Maybe it's the plan later, who knows.pic.twitter.com/064QVqLztl
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @Monkey_MarkP and
Look at the Gillette brand, not p&g as a whole because they own everything. If I remember correctly, They lost value. People boycotting Gillette in particular, and P&G stopped those dumb ads.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'd need a source on that. All I have is a stock value that makes a strange jump after that video went up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.