LOL. Don't be dumb. If it has viewers - there is money to be made.
-
-
Replying to @Monkey_MarkP @Bill_Bickers and
If Pepsi, Volvo, or StateFarm refuse to put their name next to it, the views are worthless. Because no one is paying for them.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @Monkey_MarkP and
Before YT drastically changed so much it was about views but now if you make content that is remotely close to being aggressive or otherwise what they deem unworthy of ad revenue then they won’t put up ads for that video and that is a major upset for creators that care about
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jordanreapers @atradaitoshi and
I and many other creators don’t really care for making money on YT - yes it helps with bills an what not most definitely but a lot of creators enjoy making videos but if YouTube can’t provide a better reason why a video got struck or w.e then the platform will die out eventually
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jordanreapers @Monkey_MarkP and
You may not care about making money on YouTube but they do, and it's all they care about. Anything they can't explicitly profit off of will eventually just be purged from the platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @jordanreapers and
The LGBT population is 5% companies constantly make advertisements geared toward them. Do you think it's profitable to make ads for 5% of the population?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Monkey_MarkP @jordanreapers and
Those ads can appeal to LGBT sympathizers ("woke people") as well. Of whom you can't exactly measure the size of. If it weren't making money, they wouldn't be doing it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @jordanreapers and
Tell that to Gillette. It's about keeping a narrative. Once a company has enough money - they no longer need to make more, and now the narrative is what matters. Once Youtube had a monopoly on all user/online videos THEN the new rules started to come.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Monkey_MarkP @jordanreapers and
No - There is never "enough" money. That is not how business works. As
@Bill_Bickers was saying, ad blockers are rampant. And so Gillette went the route of advertising through word of mouth. Controversy gets people talking. You're talking about them right now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atradaitoshi @jordanreapers and
You're right. That's not a how a business works. You would think years after 'GET WOKE GO BROKE' these companies would learn that's not how you make money. But they always keep doing it. Because of the narrative they have to follow.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Or it's making them tons of money.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.