Yet, you have no concern about that. The pervasiveness of a common taxonomy that's reflective of hard norms that might be bad.
-
-
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
The fact that development practices are largely homogenous in large tech companies and largely unquestioned.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
"best practices" so often become sacred cows. All a function of lack of cognitive diversity. But i don't see you talking about that.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers
You're just ignoring that my document is scientifically valid and attacking me because I didn't talk about every kind of viewpoint diversity
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @JamesADamore
No it isn't. You wildly misinterpret the science.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @espiers
No, I didn't. Your only comeback to the Quillette article are empty ad hominem attacks on the scientists.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @JamesADamore
Saying that scientific knowledge in one field is not de facto transitive to another is not an ad hominem attack. It's a statement of fact.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @espiers
The document was in psychology and so were the scientists.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @JamesADamore
The core point that people take issue with in your document is not a psychological one. It's about female quantitative aptitude.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
Did you even read the memo? It's about sex diffs in preferences and interests, not aptitudes. Or are you deliberately misrepresenting it?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.