What's disturbing is that only diversity you care about cognitively is whether people think women & minorities are intellectually inferior
-
-
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
It's not as if you're debating what you characterize as cognitive diversity against any other measurement.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
In fact you seem to think the primary if not only indicator of cognitive diversity is whether you're allowed to construe a bigoted opinion
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
As a scientifically validated fact. You do not discuss anything else in your "manifesto".
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
Cognitive diversity would also affect many things relevant to your work that have nothing to do with the diversity of google's workforce.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
Yet, you have no concern about that. The pervasiveness of a common taxonomy that's reflective of hard norms that might be bad.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
The fact that development practices are largely homogenous in large tech companies and largely unquestioned.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers @JamesADamore
"best practices" so often become sacred cows. All a function of lack of cognitive diversity. But i don't see you talking about that.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @espiers
In fact, I did talk about using pair programming in the section of how to get more women into tech.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JamesADamore
You think advocating for pair programming is some kind of obscure viewpoint?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It would be at literally every company I've worked for in this industry.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.