how about legalizing, but regulating the dangerous things? That's worked well in the past hasn't it?
-
-
-
A bit more reasonable than a full repeal of the 2nd amendment.
-
don't people usually cry out about that when even the smallest bit of regulation is proposed? My impression could be wrong.
-
Yeah absolutely. I'm simply addressing the inconsistency between criminalizing drugs doing nothing but it magically will for guns?
-
true true. People want what they like to be legal and what they don't to be illegal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there's a lot of cases where it worked (see australia for instance)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.