With companies we can stop giving money and they go out of business. With government you get what you get.https://twitter.com/monad_cat/status/738439361893634048 …
-
-
Replying to @atommorgan
true, but in the same manner you can change any govt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @monad_cat
Plenty of examples where that simply isn't true. Even in America.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atommorgan
of course. But in the same vain dupont didnt go out of business after http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0V6312 … Changing big orgs is always hard
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @monad_cat
I'm not saying going under is 100%. The potential is there and there's choice. People, market, decides whether they stay.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atommorgan
I chose this example to show that companies can falsify lab data for years and get away with it. Neither comp or govt are ideal
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @monad_cat @atommorgan
but as companies grow bigger they become as hard to change, or even harder, than the govt, which at least has public elections
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
government has a military and police. they will always be harder to change.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.