New essay from @patrickc and myself, arguing that science has suffered from greatly diminishing returns over the past century:https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/diminishing-returns-science/575665/ …
-
Show this thread
-
The subjective survey methodology guarantees the outcome will be dominated by availability bias. "Sharks kill more people than mosquitos!" Today there are: (1) many more innovations (2) happening more frequently (3) on a far more distributed basis (4) developed by more people.
2 replies 0 retweets 31 likes -
I don't think I understand the first part of the comment - could you clarify? Do you mean ppl will reply with whatever past discovery is top of mind, not based on merits? In the second part it sounds as though you're saying there will be diminishing returns(?)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The innovations pointed to by Gordon are "Edison invents lightbulb" style innovation. Today's innovations are more like Kubernetes (open-source container-orchestration). Today there's no lone inventor like Edison. Distributed continuous incremental innovation is the new normal.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @trengriffin @michael_nielsen and
As another example, Linus Torvalds invented Git. Many people contributed to making that technology valuable and spreading its usage and usability. Git isn't easy to grasp like the toilet Gordon likes to talk about. Where's the Nobel prize for computer science and software?
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes
An interesting example, as Linus is not an academic and the Linux Foundation is not a traditional research-funding organization. So, Git is a major innovation, but outside the normal framework of science.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.