Also, do we have comparison on how soon Obama's folks were nominated & when they got paperwork in?
-
-
-
Not as quick as trumps but that's what he's going after. He thinks passing things & getting things done so quick
-
Not sure about that - some may not have completed vetting even now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They fairly OOZE hypocrisy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let's see how it goes 4 years later. I hope they can keep it up
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@nycjim Trump should just put in Merrick Garland then.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
cc Integrity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if he goes to the most conservative judge it will set off a firestorm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great job by the journalists to not follow up with Merrick garland
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
You currently have four potential party-switchers, already in deep trouble in 2018., who have good reason to vote w/ R
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@notbern Well that doesn't take rocket science. Block 1year for lax decision making process and 2nd yr because 2018 election year.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
thanks but our constitution disagrees. cc: Constitutional Crisis.
@aterkel -
Tweet unavailable
-
cc: Constitutional Crisis
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That seat should just stay unfilled. Other seats, if they come open, qualified nominees should be given a hearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.