It makes sense if your goal is to go after the accuser.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The intention isn't question her. It's to *prosecute* her.
-
This supremely obvious reality is missed on several TV commentators, and I find it to be very frustrating.https://twitter.com/ianinamerica/status/1045038171120193536 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's what I was thinking! This prosecutor is a longtime sex crimes victims' rights advocate. So odd for the GOP to hire her...and odd for her to even accept the role.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It makes sense if your true purpose is not going after the truth but you’re just looking to eviscerate the accuser
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then question him too, have him take a lie detector test
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So Dems and leftists won’t bash GOP lawmakers for analyzing her statements? Yea, whatever
-
Yeah, imagine citizens questioning what GOP lawmakers do. They are SO pure and innocent. Thanks for another dope comment. IOKIYAR - always and forever. Right “Jeremy”?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh, okay... we'll get a plumber and a drywall installer then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.