Finally! Yes, this!
-
-
-
Sen. Boker's argument appears to be very logical and rational, one most ordinary Americans can understand. So that means no Trumpsters will have a clue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Logical. Responsible. Anything else allows for a conflict of interest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. It's a good argument and the Dems must do everything in their power to postpone this vote.
-
CALL YOUR SENATOR AND TELL THEM! I called mine today and said no one under investigation should be able to appoint judges that will rule on that investigation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The most import questions, both substantively and politically, are "Do you believe Potus can obstruct justice in an investigation by the DOJ?" and "Do you believe the law allows Potus to pardon himself?" Will
@corybooker ask and demand an answer?https://twitter.com/aterkel/status/1012439802619289613 … -
The nominee will just punt on any question that gets close to any controversial legal question, not just this one. And Dem caucus lets them do it.
-
I agree that this is normally the case, but there are ways to make it a political mess for Trump and the nominee, which is really the only thing Dems can hope forhttps://twitter.com/nowherenorthere/status/1012446073640685571 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s my Senator!
-
And he's wonderful. Articulate, rational and kind...I wish our country had more like him!
-
I just wish our country was safe!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They should. How can we talk about lifetime appointment when entire govt is under cloud of suspicion. At very least, have a panel led by exPresidents tell us if there's real NatSec crisis or if it's Dem smokescreen. And if Congress can be trusted to proceed w/ any nomination
-
We know Congress can't be trusted.
-
This proposal could help make that clear to a few more people. I'm not talking the hard-line supporters - they're hopeless. But enough of the undecideds. We almost have the numbers we need already.25% still supported Nixon when he resigned. 35% Joe McCarthy when censured
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
About fucking time! No nominees for a POTUS under criminal investigation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please COMPARE what happened in WISCONSIN to what is now happening to the United States--We've seen this show before and it did not end well. I'm hearing too many saying this is "uncharted" territory. Not really. Wisconsin was the template. Step up Amanda! You can do it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dems should be unequivocal about Trump's criminal ties to Putin and go for the jugular.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- End of conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.