Question 1) I read too many sites to pay for subscription to all of them! Answer: That is a pity, because they cannot afford to give you journalism unless you subscribe, and will go out of business, at which point you won't be able to read them.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Question 2) Okay, I get that. So how about a Spotify/Netflix style service, where we bundle all the subscriptions in one place. Why can't that work? Answer 2) It can work! Just not at the price you are imagining, which is, I am betting, somewhere around the $20 mark.
Show this thread -
To report one column (next week's print column), I have already spent four hours on the phone, more hours doing research, and a really fun-filled weekend with taxpayer files. That's not that unusual.
Show this thread -
Someone has to pay for that time, because my bank will not accept mortgage payment in the form of retweets. And I write opinion! Reported stuff is even more time consuming. For one 2500 word column a month at the Atlantic, I spent 25-50% of my month reporting.
Show this thread -
Also I have editors and IT folks and stuff backing me up. All of this costs $$$. And the thing is, writers like to pay their mortgage *every* month. Editors like to eat *every* day. They don't want to get paid by the click. And you don't really want them to get paid by the click
Show this thread -
I know this because you are *constantly* complaining to me about clickbait, and the sites that live on it. That's what news looks like in a Spotify scenario. All of it. But that's not even the biggest problem. (See how I hooked you to read the next tweet there? Clickbait. :)
Show this thread -
Spotify just isn't working for artists. I mean, it's better than the alternative, which is having your stuff pirated, and getting nothing. But it's not a whole lot better than that.https://spinditty.com/industry/why-so-many-artists-hate-spotify …
Show this thread -
The difference is that people have always made music as a hobby, for attention and applause, long before there was a music industry. People will do it for love, and for the hope of winning the tournament.
Show this thread -
No one's going to cover the USDA for love. (Except some lobbying firm, maybe, but then you're not really going to trust the journalism).
Show this thread -
Also, it's really hard to get people to come see you read your reporting at a live event, or buy your t-shirt. We can't use it as a loss leader for ancillary revenue streams.
Show this thread -
The craziest thing is, it's not even clear that the Spotify model is working *for Spotify*. It's the most successful model of its kind in the world, and the company's financials are brutal:https://www.ft.com/content/974206c0-2609-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0 …
Show this thread -
So yeah, I get why you want this. I'd love it to! But the math doesn't work.
Show this thread -
And this leads me to a broader point: most people have a seriously, seriously warped view of what stuff is supposed to cost. So when they propose business models, they sound like teenagers talking about how Dad should buy them a car. I say this with love. I'm guilty too.
Show this thread -
RIght now, *huge* portions of your tech consumption are being financed by burning VC money. Uber. Spotify. Many of those new media sites you guys have been telling me "prove" that it is totally possible to do good journalism on a free model.
Show this thread -
There have been three big waves of media startups in the last twenty years. The third wave is currently in the "Figure out a business model or close up shop" phase of the cycle. Making predictions is folly, but here's a prediction: there won't be a fourth wave.
Show this thread -
The economics just never got better. We're currently exhausting the last wave of stupid cheap money that is going to flow into this business.
Show this thread -
There *are* business models that currently work. But there's no guarantee they work for long--witness the current wave of site shutdowns after a Facebook algorithm switch gutted yet more revenue streams. And they're not big enough to support a lot of broad-spectrum journalism.
Show this thread -
The Facebook/Google dominance of ad revenue just keeps getting worse for us, and shows no signs of stopping. And why would it? They've got a captive audience with remarkable micro-targeting capabilities no one else can match.
Show this thread -
When the stupid money burns out, it will look less obvious that free works. Just my opinion. But I've had no reason to change it in recent months. The remnants of the first and second waves of media startups are now getting bought for fractions of their peak valuations.
Show this thread -
If they are surviving at all. And this is broadly true in lots of categories: eventually Uber is going to have to charge you what it actually cots to deliver a ride, or go out of business. Eventually Spotify will have to make a stable profit, or die.
Show this thread -
I am not saying this with triumph! I love Spotify! I love Uber! But math is math, and stupid money runs out.
Show this thread -
Over the last 25 years, enormous sums have been spent in the hopes that your investment is the next Amazon/Facebook/Google. But there is a reason there are only three of these names. People are starting to realize that.
Show this thread -
And that brings me to the hidden subsidy to much web journalism that no one talks about much: the human capital subsidy.
Show this thread -
By way of illustration: a hidden problem with Uber's business model is that, AFAICT, Uber drivers mostly don't do what professional taxi and truck drivers do, and factor in vehicle depreciation as a business expense.
Show this thread -
This makes them think that they are making more than they are, an illusion that will be brutally punctured when their vehicle craps out and they have to buy another. Something similar can be seen in the new media model.
Show this thread -
Old journalism HR model: work for an alt-weekly or local paper and work your way up, or maybe stay at the local, not making a great salary, but you're living somewhere cheap & the job is pretty fun.
Show this thread -
New media model: Get right into writing opinion/analysis journalism with no boring intervening steps covering the school board at a new media site. Or if lucky, go to work for one of the big legacy outlets, which are few in number.
Show this thread -
I was one of the very first creatures of the new media model. I blogged for years, started working for The Economist on the web, and worked my way up to an amazing job courtesy of The Atlantic, Newsweek, Bloomberg, and the Post.
Show this thread -
The hours I logged in my early years as a professional blogger were insane. I regularly worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week. It's not literally true that I never stopped working, but it sure felt like it. A lot of young journalists today do that to feed the click beast.
Show this thread -
The problem is, you can't keep it up. Journalism doesn't pay well enough to outsource your life once you have a family. Also you get old and tired and you just don't have the stamina.
Show this thread - 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.