Presumably, those calling for shoot-to-kill as sole police tactic don't want terrorists on trial to get testimony about links, reasons.
I'd like to see more of them tried & convicted in courts of law. But the media often hype their platforms in covering them (eg. Breivik)
-
-
Ways they are being radicalized inside the country, their contacts in communities and State must be scrutinized publicly.
-
Totally agreed on that. But media has a ways to go to learn to cover these stories responsibly (ie. not amplifying radicalization.)
-
This is one of the dangers. Another is for experience to remain in the shadows and be perennially sensationalized. Think of trials of Nazis
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn't one way to do this be to separate intent and motive, as with (at least US) criminal law? The State is not required to prove motive.
-
The state is required to prove that someone intended to commit the crimes they did, not why.
-
It's the motive that is sensationalized by media & politicians...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.