Presumably, those calling for shoot-to-kill as sole police tactic don't want terrorists on trial to get testimony about links, reasons.
-
-
Replying to @zoemavroudi
We've never heard these people speak or discuss how they were radicalized in a court of law. Keeping it this way is useful to whom exactly?
1 reply 11 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @zoemavroudi
Isn't it ironic that governments listen in and read your calls/emails but would rather shoot-to-kill than arrest and interrogate terrorists?
1 reply 5 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zoemavroudi
I'm assuming the point of fake suicide vests was "don't arrest me." Why play in to that?
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zoemavroudi @asteris
Because, perhaps, at the time, law enforcement did not know them to be fake?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeParmele @zoemavroudi
Asteris Masouras 正义 Retweeted
Larger issue is that many of these attackers turn out to be "known to authorities" https://twitter.com/shashj/status/871695327212044288 …
Asteris Masouras 正义 added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asteris @zoemavroudi
And so, how do we resolve that issue before any crime has been committed?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not talking pre-crime. Intel services have enough tools/data at their disposal to avert many of those attacks
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.