Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @aspiwack
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @aspiwack
-
Arnaud Spiwack proslijedio/la je Tweet
libgen/scihub are of such monumental social/moral worth that their illegality delegitimizes the law as a whole
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In fact, I believe that French had very few words of Greek origin prior to this.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This long-winded story was only to get me to a point: when a French-speaker sees the ‘ch’ digram, they instinctively read it ʃ (like ‘sh’ in English). It reads k mostly in words imported from Greek at this very time (or since!). (as pointed out by
@wtgowers )Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Nevertheless these fellows (keyword: La pléiade) had a tremendous influence on the French language.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The plan kind of failed, because the new word rarely displaced the original word, rather took a different, more specialised meaning (“ausculter” comes to mind: it was meant to replace “écouter”, but it now only pertains to using a stethoscope).
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Somehow, we kept the two forms for slightly different usages. I will decline all responsibilities.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This is how French got stuck with “credible” for “believable” but “incroyable” for “incredible”. The former has travelled through centuries of language shaping, the latter jumped directly from ancient text books into modern French.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I don't know. Anyway. They set to rebuild the French language, to make it more betterer. To that effect they mostly decided to ignore 1000 year of French morphology and re-import words from Latin and Greek (antiquity was cool in the 16th Century, much like the 1970s are now).
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
[Caveat emptor: I am not a medical doctor, this and the rest of this thread should not be construed as a medical diagnosis or advice]
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
There was a bunch of jolly chaps in the 1500s who decided that French was butt ugly. I think it was a mix of inferiority complex (Renaissance had started in Italy), and teenager syndrom (Renaissance is not like the Middle Ages, you don't understand anything Daaaad).
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
To be fair,
@sigfpe French is weird. Like, very weird. Except weirder. I mean, I realise that your native language is English, but humour me.https://twitter.com/sigfpe/status/1223288059560480768 …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I'll be streaming a game of Zelda: a link to the past, randomizer tonight. I'll be trying a logic with glitches taken into account. And chatting about combination locks. Stream starts at 20.45 UTChttps://www.twitch.tv/notnotarnaud
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Only it hadn't been connected to the data/control intuition before. It's a cute little story. The strength requirement is often forgotten because of how all monads are strong (aka enriched) in Hask.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This do-notation business has been known since before the monads were a thing in Haskell: Moggi needed *strong* monads to give semantics to effects. In a self-enriched category, strong monads and enriched monads are the same.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I didn't speak about `Traversable` at all, but traversable functors do belong in the data hierarchy (I don't believe there is any value in coming up with a control equivalent of traversables but I'd be thrilled to be wrong!)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This also proves, incidentally, that data applicative are not a super-class of data monads since lists are the latter, but not the former (control applicative, however, are a super-class of control monads).
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
With linear types, lists form a data monad, but not a control monad. This is witnessed by the fact that the do-notation, on lists, lets me make cartesian products, which are definitely not linear.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This is why I don't speak about data monads too much in the blog post: they are less evidently useful. You can still use them to model substitution (e.g. in first-order terms).
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The distinction is about what I can do with a functor, rather than what it is. That's why individual functors can be control or not depending on the situation.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
What distinguishes data and control, essentially, is that you can use the do-notation with control monads, but not with data monads.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.