@HPluckrose Then we're no better than them. What has either side learned? I repeat the Westboro Baptist Church example.
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison We'd be no better than them if their expression was non-physical - words or art. I encourage & support Islamists to do this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
@HPluckrose If our beef is with Islamic attitudes, then what is the rationale for using a religious idol? Because it's offensive?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Its not as though I'm going to thrust a cartoon of Muhammad having sex with a pig in a Muslim's face over lunch.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
@HPluckrose just the redneck's interpretation of free speech a.k.a. flipping the entire Muslim world the bird. Hmm.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison And they can do that. The 'Muslim world' can respond with their own expression as can we liberals against anti-Muslim bigotry
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
@HPluckrose And, thus, we devolve into name-calling. Where does that get us, Helen?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison What do you mean? I think you might have misunderstood me. What name calling?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
@HPluckrose What are cartoons of Muhammed by thinly-veiled name-calling? Seriously? And, thus, your contention was that their answer could >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Its insulting the prophet of Islam - the symbol of a religious ideology. Name calling is insulting a person -can also be valid
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@HPluckrose Name-calling is beneath us; stupid cartoons are beneath us. How can we not, by now, recognize this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.