@Cole69361910 @emlynaddison @ViveCharIie @Prolient @louididdy @JihadistJoe my point is simple; drop it if its offensive
@HPluckrose That's irrelevant. We're holding CONTESTS to see who can draw the most vile portrait of Muhammed? THIS is our best idea??
-
-
@emlynaddison Also it is not irrelevant whether ppl are forced to hear or see other's speech. Its absolutely central to human rights.
-
@HPluckrose And it ain't cartoons of some prophet riding a donkey ffs. -
.@emlynaddison I disagree and think when someone says you can't do something on pain of death, needs to be done, even if distasteful.
-
@HPluckrose existing bigots/xenophobes that Muslims can't be trusted. We've learned nothing. THAT is not what free speech is for.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison No, its not the best idea. Its one reaction. I prefer to blog & argue myself.
-
@HPluckrose HOORAY! We're GETTING somewhere! -
@emlynaddison I can criticise motivations & bigoted generalisations strongly but support the right to attack religious ideology. Can't you?
-
@HPluckrose FUNDAMENTALIST religious ideology; let's be clear. And, if by criticize, you mean sober, rational measures to expose it >
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison Here is an excellent blog by ex-Muslim & liberal against bigoted generalisations,
@NiceMangos. http://www.nicemangos.blogspot.ca/2015/05/a-former-apologist-on-free-speech.html … -
@HPluckrose@NiceMangos I'll read it, but I'm not so much interested in the perspective of ex-Muslims but current practicers of free speech. -
@emlynaddison
@HPluckrose@NiceMangos why are ex-muslims not included in the "practicers of free speech" group?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.