@Cole69361910 @emlynaddison @ViveCharIie @Prolient @louididdy @JihadistJoe my point is simple; drop it if its offensive
-
-
@emlynaddison We'd be no better than them if their expression was non-physical - words or art. I encourage & support Islamists to do this.
-
@HPluckrose If our beef is with Islamic attitudes, then what is the rationale for using a religious idol? Because it's offensive? -
@emlynaddison Its not as though I'm going to thrust a cartoon of Muhammad having sex with a pig in a Muslim's face over lunch.
-
@HPluckrose You might as well be; that's my point. This contest had patently nothing to do with "solidarity" with Charlie Hebdo. It was > -
@emlynaddison No! If anyone tried to force Muslims to attend the competition, this wld be utterly different. Have the right not to attend it
-
@HPluckrose That's irrelevant. We're holding CONTESTS to see who can draw the most vile portrait of Muhammed? THIS is our best idea?? -
@emlynaddison Also it is not irrelevant whether ppl are forced to hear or see other's speech. Its absolutely central to human rights.
-
@HPluckrose And it ain't cartoons of some prophet riding a donkey ffs. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison
@HPluckrose WBC are rightly free to express opinions that nearly everyone finds distasteful. What's your point? -
@sirtophamhat@HPluckrose You answered it yourself, though 'distasteful' is too kind, you'll agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.