@Gomba13 @jacobchatterjee @emlynaddison 10 for 1? Ok. Go for it. Let's have them. At least a few. How about 3? Go ahead. Argue for atheism.
-
-
Replying to @BillyMcWhirter
@BillyMcWhirter @jacobchatterjee @emlynaddison And a bonus: I don't need to have moral high ground to be just as valuable to humanity.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Gomba13
@Gomba13@BillyMcWhirter The fact that so many are moral sans creation myths is evidence enough that religion's present effect is null.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter I'd say even damageable. But I do know religious people who derive great therapeutic value from religion.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Gomba13
@Gomba13@BillyMcWhirter Yes, as they do from meditation, therapy, yoga, exercise and drugs. But none of those control science education.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter For science education, there is always home schooling, easy to obtain in Canada, I don't know for the US.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gomba13
@Gomba13@BillyMcWhirter But the home schooling option merely encourages anti-intellectual, anti-social clan mentality & invites other ills.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter Not necessarily. It isn't without risk, but better that than teaching a kid that humans rode dinosaurs!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gomba13
@Gomba13@BillyMcWhirter Sure...if I *HAD* to live in a backwater fiefdom, yes I'd probably home school. But it invites xenophobia.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter It depends on the learning environment created by parent and how she compensates for lack of social setting.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Gomba13 @BillyMcWhirter (See #freerangeparenting, on that score)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.