@jacobchatterjee @emlynaddison @BillyMcWhirter Arguments are not The Truth + U forget that for each argument for god, there's 10 for atheism
@BillyMcWhirter @Gomba13 But in technical terms there is more data supporting scientific conclusions than faith-based refutations.
-
-
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter True, but the lack of data supporting the opposite argument doesn't mean it has no merit. -
@Gomba13@BillyMcWhirter In all that can be said to be empirically knowable, it does. We reach a point where fantastic claims are just that. -
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter But empirically knowable stuff is not all of the story. For all we know, there is ten times more we don't. -
@Gomba13@BillyMcWhirter Exactly, but we base our understanding of what is possible on what we understand is possible. Plotting snakes? -
@emlynaddison
@BillyMcWhirter That would be fine if we did it taking for granted that we don't know the half of it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.