@BkgndReality @DaveRosss @noreligionisok @BillyMcWhirter @pooroldkilgore @bmfogler That part that makes no grammatical sense.
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler "The premise still stands"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@emlynaddison
@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler "I have no idea what animals think of objective morality"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler Yet despite that, you will assert god = morality. Hmmmm.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison No. No God = No objective morality. Therefore objective morality = God exists.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality @emlynaddison wow your logic is so flawed, there is no such thing as objective morality2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pooroldkilgore
@pooroldkilgore @emlynaddison so are you saying, 'the logic is there, but objective morality isn't, therefore not proof of God'?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality @emlynaddison dude the argument that God exists because of objective morality has been refuted so many times4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @pooroldkilgore
@pooroldkilgore@BkgndReality I was just trying to remember how many times I've had this convo; it is NEVER original.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@pooroldkilgore why don't you demonstrate what's wrong then?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BkgndReality @pooroldkilgore We've been trying to, but you insist on falling back on a false equivalency rooted in your "belief in facts".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.