@emlynaddison @DaveRosss @noreligionisok @BillyMcWhirter @pooroldkilgore @bmfogler which part?
-
-
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler That part that makes no grammatical sense.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler "The premise still stands"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@emlynaddison
@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler "I have no idea what animals think of objective morality"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@pooroldkilgore@bmfogler Yet despite that, you will assert god = morality. Hmmmm.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison No. No God = No objective morality. Therefore objective morality = God exists.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality @emlynaddison wow your logic is so flawed, there is no such thing as objective morality2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pooroldkilgore
@pooroldkilgore @emlynaddison so are you saying, 'the logic is there, but objective morality isn't, therefore not proof of God'?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BkgndReality
@BkgndReality@pooroldkilgore@DaveRosss@noreligionisok@BillyMcWhirter@bmfogler Still no answer for moral behavior in animals.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
.@emlynaddison no, are you asking 'what they say under interview' or 'how we judge of their behaviour with our standards' or something else?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BkgndReality So, because animals can't talk, or because you didn't study animal behavior/psychology, you maintain that your premise is true
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.