@YekatWaarseth When their narrative isn't being adequately served by their ineffectual philosophical gotchas, they move on. @darinlatham
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @YekatWaarseth "Maybe 'nothing' is more complex than 'something'". That's priceless. I'm still enjoying that one.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham @YekatWaarseth I, nor they, nor YOU--Gasp! Imagine that!--can claim to KNOW what matter or anti-matter is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @YekatWaarseth I may not know WHAT matter "is", but I know if it "is" it is NOT "nothing!"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham @YekatWaarseth The cosmic mysticist will invariably fall back on semantic shenaniganism to evade the need to concede anything.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @YekatWaarseth U call "nothing" "something" yet I am guilty of semantic shenaniganism? wow.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@darinlatham @YekatWaarseth Because your black-and-white cosmic mysticist's version of nothing is a self-serving canard.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.