@darinlatham @_Four_Horsemen @RichardDawkins They didn't; only YOU have been using the term "nothing".
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins You might want to read the title of the book Dawkins recommended I read Emlyn.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins The perennial problem is that, because you operate in black-and-white, you won't look deeper.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins. And you state this based upon your thorough knowledge of my life experience and background1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins If you're now going to invoke the tired "subjectivity" canard, go jump off a building.#Gravity1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins I have no idea what u r talking about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Yes you do. Subjectivity is not an argument against observable KNOWABLE phenomena.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Observable only applies to "something" not "nothing"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins But you, you criticize even the STUDY of such questions using lame semantic parries.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins I WELCOME the study of reality! I reject calling "something" "nothing" in the name of science2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@darinlatham @_Four_Horsemen @RichardDawkins Just as Albert points out: the cosmic mysticists will demand absolutes of the unknown.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.