@darinlatham @RichardDawkins I think* you are trying to argue with common sense. Physics doesn't care about your common sense.
-
-
Replying to @_Four_Horsemen
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Speaking non-sense (labelling something as "nothing") and calling it "physics" is an odd approach.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins They didn't; only YOU have been using the term "nothing".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins You might want to read the title of the book Dawkins recommended I read Emlyn.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins The perennial problem is that, because you operate in black-and-white, you won't look deeper.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins. And you state this based upon your thorough knowledge of my life experience and background1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins If you're now going to invoke the tired "subjectivity" canard, go jump off a building.#Gravity1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins I have no idea what u r talking about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Yes you do. Subjectivity is not an argument against observable KNOWABLE phenomena.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Observable only applies to "something" not "nothing"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@darinlatham @_Four_Horsemen @RichardDawkins You can't "observe" gravity, only its effects. Do you know nothingness' effects?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.