Because the alternative, in @darinlatham's mind, must therefore begin with a plotting snake.
@YekatWaarseth @RichardDawkins @_Four_Horsemen
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @YekatWaarseth
@RichardDawkins@_Four_Horsemen Agreed. Science, however is not the study of "nothing"!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham @YekatWaarseth@RichardDawkins@_Four_Horsemen Science is the study of everything. "Everything" includes non-stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @YekatWaarseth
@RichardDawkins@_Four_Horsemen. If by "non-stuff" u mean "nothing" how do we know "nothing" when we "see" it?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @darinlatham
@darinlatham @YekatWaarseth @RichardDawkins @_Four_Horsemen But you don't bother to find out, you just lob empty criticism borne from faith.
11:53 AM - 10 Apr 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.