@darinlatham @_Four_Horsemen @RichardDawkins The term "nothing" used there does not in any way define the complete absence of "stuff".
-
-
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins. That's the problem!!!! He defines "something" (the quantum vacuum) as "nothing"!!! -
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Followed almost immediately by "he has an argument — or thinks he does" <-- That's science
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.